90 incidents on record · 2026 Headlights Incident reports by Ellie Harris · Melbourne
10 new this week Library last updated 13 July 2026
← The incident library
HD-INC-038
Technology · United States · 2023 · Hallucination & fabrication

Sports Illustrated ran articles under author names and headshots that belonged to no real person

By Ellie Harris · Filed November 2023

Alleged: The Arena Group (Sports Illustrated); AdVon Commerce (vendor) developed or deployed the AI system implicated in this incident. Details are drawn from public reports; parties are presumed innocent of any wrongdoing not established by an official finding.

Sports Illustrated ran articles under author names and headshots that belonged to no real person

What happened

In November 2023 Futurism reported that Sports Illustrated had published product reviews under author names that could not be found anywhere outside the Sports Illustrated site, accompanied by profile photos that were AI-generated and offered for sale on a marketplace of synthetic headshots. A byline credited to Drew Ortiz, for instance, carried a portrait that was on sale on the AI-face marketplace generated.photos, where it was listed as “neutral white young-adult male with short brown hair and blue eyes.” During the reporting, some of those bylines were swapped for other names that also did not appear to belong to real people, with likenesses likewise drawn from the same kind of marketplace.

The Arena Group, which operated Sports Illustrated, said the material had come from a third-party vendor, AdVon Commerce, under a licensing arrangement, removed the content, and ended the partnership. It denied that the articles themselves had been written by AI. Months later the group’s chief executive was dismissed amid the fallout.

The claim that the article text was AI-generated is disputed, and this entry does not assert it. What is not in dispute is narrower and still serious: readers were shown fabricated authors, invented names attached to synthetic faces, presented as real journalists on one of the best-known mastheads in American sport.

What an auditable version would have shown

When a masthead is asked who wrote a piece, it should be able to answer. Sports Illustrated could not, because nothing in the pipeline tied a published byline to a real, accountable person, or recorded that an item had come from a vendor and how it had been produced. An auditable version records, for each published item, who or what produced it, whether it was AI-assisted, and the real author of record, captured at the time. That record makes the question answerable in advance, and it makes a fabricated identity something the system rejects rather than something a reporter discovers.

Where the gap was

The gap was provenance. There was no record connecting a published byline to an accountable author, and a vendor was able to feed fabricated identities into a trusted masthead without the publisher being able to show otherwise. The control is a ConductRecord that ties each published item to who or what produced it and to a real author of record, combined with a vendor relationship, contractual and technical, in which a supplier cannot insert content or identities the publisher cannot account for. The same vendor blind spot appears elsewhere in this library: a third party changed what reached the public, and the deploying organisation could not say what had happened.

What governance should have looked like

The masthead is the asset. Attaching it to fabricated authors spends the credibility that is the whole reason the name has value. A safe arrangement requires a real, accountable author of record for anything published, plain disclosure where content is AI-assisted, and a vendor bound so it cannot quietly substitute synthetic identities into the brand. None of that prevents using AI tools or outside suppliers. It prevents publishing people who do not exist.

The reference implementation of ConductRecord is open source, alongside the other Headlights governance modules. It lives at github.com/saffronandindia/headlights-oss, Apache 2.0 licensed and free to install. The repository is public now.

Sources

The mailing list

Fresh incident reports every week. One email to match.

We add new incidents to the library regularly, and send a single short email each week with what's new. The library stays free and open; this is just how you keep up with it.

No tracking. Unsubscribe in one click.

The record

An auditable system would have produced a signed, tamper-evident record the moment this happened: what the system did, the version that did it, the basis it acted on, and the action taken, and The Arena Group (Sports Illustrated); AdVon Commerce (vendor) could have produced it on demand.

This is the record the system as deployed did not produce in a signed, auditable form.

What this teaches
Capture what happened when it happens
What the system did, the version that did it, the basis it acted on, and the action taken, recorded at the moment, not reconstructed after.
Sign it, so no one has to trust the record-keeper
A tamper-evident entry. Edit it later and the signature breaks. The record does not ask for the benefit of the doubt.
Make it verifiable by anyone
A court, a regulator, a customer's lawyer can check the record themselves, without taking the company, or us, at our word.

Headlights summarises publicly reported AI incidents. All summaries are independently written, attributed to their original sources, and intended for research and educational purposes. Allegations are identified as such until established through official findings.

Last reviewed June 2026. This report is based on the sources listed above and reflects information available at the time of review; later developments may not be captured. Where a person is described as charged with or alleged to have done something, that allegation is unproven unless a conviction or a court or regulatory finding is stated. Headlights publishes journalism and commentary, not legal advice.

Want to write back?

Direct to my inbox.

ellie@useheadlights.com →